Anthropology: Growth and Relevance, Not Popularity

Anthropologists can suffer from Jared Diamond envy. Here in the United States we bemoan when Diamond’s latest book rises on the bestseller list. While he might deliver anthropology-lite to the masses, he’s not even an anthropologist! goes the lament. It’s not even good anthropology, others add. Undergrads could take it apart.

Then the questions begin: Where are all the popular anthropologists? Why don’t we have one or more Jared Diamonds ourselves?

This pursuit of popularity is a mistaken one, I believe. It’s as if we want to turn Monty Python and the Holy Grail into a Jerry Bruckheimer action movie:

Anthropology isn’t really built that way.

Pursuing Relevance

Far better if we pursue relevance. Doing so means broadening our concept of popularity. We can find audiences that more closely match what we do as anthropologists. These might not be the mass audience some of us crave. But they might be the right audience.

A good example of this type of relevance is Liz Bird’s Asaba Memorial Project, which examines the impact of a terrible 1967 massacre during Nigeria’s civil war. Bird recently put together a video on this work, which has been taken up through social media in Nigeria and the Nigerian diaspora.

This work focuses on local relevance rather than mass popularity. 6000 views is nothing like Diamond, but as more and more anthropologists take to these forms of dissemination, our reach will grow. We should aim for the long-tail of the world, rather than swinging at the fences hoping for that mega-hit.

Growth Matters

Growing the field also matters. Increasing over overall size is key to increasing our overall impact. Anthropology is a small discipline. Growth means that we can research more of the world’s diversity and better address the myriad problems we face today.

Training more students also means more people access what we do. Most of our students go onto careers outside the discipline, and that’s a good thing. They carry anthropology with them, and then they start to solve the problem of how to make anthropology relevant to a particular job or issue. It’s the sort of grassroots growth that will last.

Given how we work as a discipline, our impact often comes through how we intersect with others. Skulls and artifacts need to be seen, often touched, to truly appreciate, and then context provided to understand their import. Field work is a day-to-day endeavor, something achieved over the long-term. Our “it’s complicated” message requires time to convey, and works better if there’s interaction that can help illustrate what’s going on.

What anthropology does isn’t easy to package into sound bites.

We need people to have an impact, not stars.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Creative Commons License
Anthropology: Growth and Relevance, Not Popularity by Neuroanthropology, unless otherwise expressly stated, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

This entry was posted in Application. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Anthropology: Growth and Relevance, Not Popularity

  1. Cadell Last says:

    Hi Daniel,

    I think you bring up a lot of great points here. However, I must humbly disagree with a few things. I think anthropology *can* be a big subject. In fact, isn’t it inherently a big subject? It is the science of humanity. It is the authority on primate and human evolution, human cultural diversity, language in all of its dimensions, and civilization. Collectively we have a wealth of knowledge that other subjects can only dream about. I think we can make academically honest literature for a popular audience that attempts to answer the big questions. And I think it is imperative that we try.

    But as far as my experience within academia is concerned, I think your message resonates with me. I haven’t seen many professors reach out and have a larger impact within society or within popular culture.

    Thanks for the post.

    Cadell

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Qualia says:

      Urmm Graeber?

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
      • dmfant says:

        ha, yes that was my thought too tho his mistaken speculations on say why working-class Americans support crony-capitalism are as ungrounded as anything that Diamond has said, and of course there seems to be even less happening in terms of meaningful “impact” than sales-appeal in anthro writ large.
        Is there really a slow but steady plan worth having in these anthropocene days of man-made climate implosion, I would say act now or forever hold your peace…

        VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
        Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  2. Pingback: Anthropology Blogs Update: Additions, Revisions, New Blogs | Anthropology Report

  3. Pingback: Anthropology roundup: “Anthropology Blogs Update… | Erkan's Field Diary

Add Comment Register



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>