TLC’s vaccine misinformation piece vanishes into the ether. Do they owe readers an explanation? (Also: Chicago Sun-Times endorsement of anti-vaccine conference remains online.) UPDATED

See bottom of post for update.

On Tuesday, TLC posted “Why shouldn’t we vaccinate our children,” which was one of the all-time worst pieces written about vaccines. It had outright falsehoods and oodles of misleading information. It was so bad, in fact, that I briefly wondered if it might be a deliberate effort to point out the lunacy of anti-vaccine activists. (It wasn’t.) That afternoon, I posted a sentence-by-sentence breakdown of one of the piece’s six sections, titled “Vaccines May or May Not Have a Link to Autism.”

The following day, the piece was updated — and several of my criticisms were addressed, although not in a manner that made any significant difference. At that point, all of the reader comments that had been added to the piece were disappeared.

Last night, Ken Reibel of Autism News Beat emailed me last night to report that he had heard from someone in the PR department of Discovery Communications, the company that owns TLC, and that the piece was going to be taken down. Sure enough. as of this morning, the piece’s original URL – http://tlc.howstuffworks.com/family/why-shouldnt-we-vaccinate-our-children.htm — is redirected to TLC’s “How Stuff Works” homepage.

In general, I’m not a big fan of simply vanishing stories, but this was a good move: TLC’s site doesn’t lend itself to corrections or clarifications, and there was no real way to “correct” this story anyway. I do think TLC’s readers deserve to know how, exactly, this happened: Is there any vetting process before pieces about serious public health issues get posted? If this level of misinformation can appear in a topic that has been written about again and again and again, does that mean the quality control on all of TLC’s coverage is this slipshod?

Meanwhile, two days after Chicago Sun-Times editor-in-chief Jim Kirk said that his paper’s endorsement of the annual Generation One/AutismOne quackfest was “incorrect,” that endorsement still appears at the bottom of the paper’s fawning Q&A with Jenny McCarthy. I reached out to Kirk yesterday, and again this morning, and haven’t heard anything back.

UPDATE: “The Sun-Times proudly supports Generation Rescue and Autism One” has finally be changed; the tag line on the bottom of the piece now reads, “TheSun-Times is a media sponsor of the event.”

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Creative Commons License
This work, unless otherwise expressly stated, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.

This entry was posted in Autism, Media, Vaccines and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to TLC’s vaccine misinformation piece vanishes into the ether. Do they owe readers an explanation? (Also: Chicago Sun-Times endorsement of anti-vaccine conference remains online.) UPDATED

  1. eldavojohn says:

    On Tuesday, TLC posted “Why shouldn’t we vaccinate our children,”

    Sorry to correct the corrector but that article appears to have been up at least as far back as July 27th, 2010.

  2. JD Blandley says:

    TLC seems more concerned about the blow back from science bloggers than about misleading readers with junk science.

  3. Ren says:

    How long until someone writes a long rant about you, Seth, censoring information on the internet?

    I say two days.

    • Jerrold Alpern says:

      Ren,

      Seth Mnookin is not censoring information. He is correcting misinformation. Misinformation that has been repeatedly, and conclusively, scientifically disproved. The decline in vaccination as a result of this misinformation has been a disaster for the health of all children in this country. See Seth’s book, “The Panic Virus” and Paul Offit’s “Deadly Choices”.

  4. tender loving care?

  5. Matt Carey says:

    They owe us good information in place of what they took down.

  6. Pingback: A Media Outlet's Specious Story Fans Debate on Vaccines | Healthland | TIME.com

  7. Pingback: Are Vaccines Safe? A Major Media Outlet’s Specious Story Fans the Debate | Across the Fader.ORG

  8. Pingback: Are Vaccines Safe? A Major Media Outlet’s Specious Story Fans the Debate « Welcome to the Doctor's Office

  9. I believe in reader power. If a significant amount of readers feel they need an explanation, and they ask for it, then I think one should be given.

  10. Pingback: Looking for a vaccine friendly doctor.... - City-Data Forum

  11. Bloss says:

    90% of all studies done on vaccines are funded by the companies that make them. The other 10% are fine by organisation not linked to drug companies. The 10% get discredited by the 90% who are paid to show a favourable outcome. Are the side effects of vaccines widely published?…..no, well hidden really, and are not voluntary offered to parents who are looking to vaccinate. Sound like a big misinformation plot to me, but you know, I’ll listen to neurosurgeons and not internet journos who really don’t know shit when it comes down to it

    • Chris says:

      Citation needed. Here is a list of studies:
      www2.aap.org/immunization/families/faq/vaccinestudies.pdf

      Now go through each one and post the pharmaceutical companies that were behind each one. Thank you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>