Calling out pseudoscience, radically changing the conversation about Amy Cuddy’s power posing paper

Posted June 14, 2017 by James Coyne PhD in Amy Cuddy, biomarkers, Clinical trials, Conflict of interest, control group, cortisol, Mind-body, positive psychology, post-publication peer review, power analysis, Pubpeer

Part 1: Reviewed as the clinical trial that it is, the power posing paper should never have been published. Has too much already been written about Amy Cuddy’s power pose paper? The conversation should not

Should have seen it coming: Once high-flying Psychological Science article lies in pieces on the ground

Posted December 30, 2015 by James Coyne PhD in critical appraisal skils, depression, hype, post-publication peer review, press release, professional organizations, Pubmed Commons, Pubpeer, retraction, Uncategorized

Life is too short for wasting time probing every instance of professional organizations promoting bad science when they have an established record of doing just that. There were lots of indicators that’s what we were

archive.php Template Name: Archive