Multi Twitter
sethmnookin: One of my favorite canals. “@BoraZ: Mary Roach Takes A Trip Down the Alimentary Canal: http://t.co/Gwpwvx4b1A”
5 hours ago
iLIKEschmaltz (mr. sunshine): RT @sethmnookin: Hadn't; brilliant name. MT @markduwe: @sethmnookin Heard of Paul Gilmartin's Mental Illness Happy Hour podcast? http://t.…
24 minutes ago
AlejoEC (Alex Christensen): #FF @scottmarks @sdmattpotter @se4realhinton @SenSanders @SenSherrodBrown @sethmnookin @shamilto @slashfilm @starshyne @StephenAtHome
24 minutes ago
betharky (Beth Arky): @sethmnookin Can't wait!
24 minutes ago
CatVander (Cat Vander): @anamariecox @sethmnookin Welcome to earth...
24 minutes ago
txtriathlete67 (Larry Gill): @anamariecox @sethmnookin @anildash Reddit: the internet equivalent of a middle school playground...
24 minutes ago
EllenDatlow (Ellen Datlow): RT @christianready: Infuriating RT @sethmnookin: UK measles/mumps outbreaks due to fears fanned by Andrew Wakefield's "elaborate fraud" ht…
24 minutes ago
powered by Incbrite Wordpress Plugins
Blog Archives
SciWriteLabs #2: Reuters’ Ivan Oransky and Wired’s Adam Rogers on sources v. subjects & more on the factchecking debate
By Seth Mnookin
Posted: October 20, 2011
Posted: October 20, 2011
Category: Journalism, science, SciWriteLabs
|
Tagged Adam Rogers, David Kroll, Embargo Watch, factchecking, Ivan Oransky, NYU, Rebecca Skloot, Retraction Watch, Reuters, SHERP, Vincent Racaniello, Wikipedia, Wired
|
4 Comments
