#IAmUninsured: An #IAmScience Story

This isn’t news to my readers but the sorry state of employment-based health insurance in the US means that anyone is one catastrophe away from bankruptcy.

A rather personal example of this came home to roost today when several folks recommended that I read Kevin Zelnio’s post on his son Elliot coming down with pneumonia and a larger discussion of the 49.1 million uninsured folks in the United States. Therein, he uses his current experience to document what happens when a family with highly-educated parents can’t provide basic healthcare for their kids because they’re either unemployed or unable to afford insurance for the self-employed.

A good man. #IAmScience

Kevin gives a great deal of himself to our community. Beyond the music he plays and the encouragement he gives to students, writers, and his own discipline of marine biology, he’s also spearheaded one of the finest post-ScienceOnline efforts of the year: #IAmScience. See this Storify for details.

Simply put, science draws people from all walks of life who come to it via different paths – Kevin shared his own emotional journey in encouraging others to do the same. The response has been overwhelming.

So, as they say, I’d like to help a brother out. If after you read Kevin’s post you feel compelled to throw a few doubloons in his direction, go ahead and tap the button below.

As Kevin sang in Bruce Springsteen’s “Atlantic City” at the ScienceOnline Open Mic night three weeks ago: “I’ve got me debts no honest man can pay.” But he does have a beautiful six-year-old son who is fortunately recovering from pneumonia. After the PayPal fees are deducted, I’ll pass along to Kevin and his family whatever you care to share.

#IAmUninsured Relief Fund


If the button doesn’t take you to the donation page, click on this link instead to go there directly.

In launching #IAmScience, Kevin wrote,

“Magical things can happen when you enthusiastically open your mouth on the internet.”

I hope so, bro.

Because you deserve to reap the love you sow.

Category: GoodPeople | 10 Comments

Misha Angrist’s Sea Cow: For North Carolina and the World

Tell Me Where It Hurts by Sea Cow. Click on link to buy album and download a few free tracks.

I just received a missive from my local creative genius colleague and fellow PLoS blogger at Genomeboy, Misha Angrist. You know, the one who wrote Here Is A Human Being: At the Dawn of Personal Genomics.

Well, the fine Dr. Angrist tells us:

My band Sea Cow will be on The State of Things on WUNC this Friday, February 3, 2012 at 12:40PM or so. Later that same day/evening, we will be soothing the savage beast inside The Cave, 452 1/2 W. Franklin Street, Chapel Hill, NC…9:30PM-ish or thereabouts followed by the ageless Jeff Hart & the Ruins. We are continuing to celebrate the recent release of “Tell Me Where It Hurts.” We are feeling feisty and defiant and would love to see and imbibe with you.

You can livestream The State of Things (with superb journalist Frank Stasio) here at WUNC-FM (go to the far right at that page to “Listen Now”). I’ve even made a nice world clock table so you can see what time 12:40 PM on 3 February in NC is in your neck of the woods.

You can listen to some Sea Cow here at Bandcamp or ReverbNation.

And if you’re in Chapel Hill tomorrow night, you may even run into me.

Category: Awesomesauce, Blogging community, Music | Leave a comment

2007 repost on intravenous milk thistle extract for amatoxin poisoning

To follow on our recent discussions of a European herbal extract with efficacy against poisoning with certain species of Amanita mushrooms, I pulled out this post that I wrote in 2007 about the outstanding work of Dr. S. Todd Mitchell. Depending on the amount of mushrooms ingested, patients can experience severe liver damage that can be lethal. In these cases – about 10 percent or so – the only real “treatment” is a liver transplant.

In searching for potential remedies for his patients who ingested amatoxin-containing mushrooms, he learned of an intravenous preparation from Europe (Legalon-SIL) containing a salt of silibinin, a pair of hepatoprotective compounds from milk thistle (Silybum marianum). Mark Blumenthal, Executive Director of the American Botanical Council, has been questioning for over 15 years why the US FDA has not made this IV drug available in emergency rooms (personal comm.).

Although silibinin and its more crude relative silymarin are available in oral forms as herbal medicines around the US and the world, they lack sufficient bioavailability for emergency treatment. Mitchell gained emergency IND status (a waiver, actually) from the FDA for this intravenous formulation and subsequently saved several family members from what was likely to be certain death.

Another story appeared two years later in the Santa Cruz Sentinel where Mitchell had to retrace his steps to again procure the drug. In 2010, the Sentinel reported that he became sponsor of an open investigational clinical trial of Legalon-SIL in the United States. (This third article was also written by Sentinel reporter, Jondi Gumz.) This trial facilitates Legalon-SIL use by physicians anywhere in the US where qualified patients have suffered amatoxin poisoning. Such trials are most commonly led from large academic medical centers; that this one is from a community hospital speaks highly of Mitchell’s determination in providing widespread access to this drug.



Continue reading »

Category: Herbal and Botanical Medicines, Natural Products Chemistry, Natural Products Pharmacology, Pharmacology, Toxicology | 3 Comments

Private correspondence made public

An interesting discussion has arisen on Twitter regarding my post earlier today on an email conversation I had with a critic of a previous blog post.

At least one person has submitted that I should not have posted a private email conversation without seeking permission of the correspondent.

Did the writer deserve the courtesy of such a request? Or did the indication not to engage online grant me journalistic license to use the exchange. Or should I have taken his reluctance to engage online as a reason not to post the exchange?

Or was I just simply exhibiting bad taste in posting a conversation that one party thought would be private?

The email was not threatening or otherwise hate mail – it was, as one commenter stated, “a tactless complaint.” Does that matter?

Was I justified in posting the conversation as a discussion point following from some conversations I had at ScienceOnline and before? Should I have simply paraphrased the content of the email? Should I have not mentioned the writer by name (even though my promotion of his clinical trial was noted in the post he criticized.).

What say you?

Category: Journalism, Science Journalism | 20 Comments

I am not your [expletive] transcriptionist

While experiencing the crack cocaine & heroin-like stimuloeuphora of ScienceOnline2012 last week, I fielded one of my relatively rare email threads of blog buzzkill. The criticism of one of my blogposts as detailed below was particularly prescient in light of the closing session I had with Maggie Koerth-Baker, Seth Mnookin, and Bora Zivkovic: Check, check, 1, 2, . . .The sticky wicket of the scientist-journalist relationship.

In discussing the process of fact-checking and the need for accurate scientific representation by the science journalist, Maggie Koerth-Baker made the excellent point that the scientist should not expect the writer to simply act as a transcriptionist. Indeed, as I learned from Cornelia Dean this past summer at the Santa Fe Science Writing Workshop, the responsibility of the writer is to the reader in crafting an engaging and still accurate story.

Well, I now know what Maggie was talking about. I received the following email last week regarding my post, Intravenous Milk Thistle for Mushroom Poisoning, for the principal investigator of an ongoing clinical trial:

Dear David,

Under most circumstances I would remain silent but with your background I assume that you wish to make your postings as accurate as possible. However, the story as written is so rife with mythology and gross misstatements that to the trained eye it comes across as simply silly.

Rather than posting on your blog I thought it might be better to contact you privately in order to give you the opportunity to edit and correct if you are so interested.

If you like we can speak when I have the screen open. There is a lot of misinformation up there on the web and so it is certainly understandable as to how you could have come up with some of this.

Please forward your phone number and we can go over it.

To which I politely responded:

Thanks so much for writing. Indeed, I strive to be as accurate as possible and am concerned that, “the story as written is so rife with mythology and gross misstatements that to the trained eye it comes across as simply silly.” I’d be delighted to have you post your concerns and corrections in the blog comments – the readership would greatly benefit from the wisdom of your expertise and having an on-the-record critique from the study director would be invaluable. No need to keep your concerns private – I find it valuable to teach my students that even the professor gets it wrong sometimes. (I’m also completely swamped with my role in the international ScienceOnline conference ongoing here in Research Triangle Park. I hope you understand.)

Thank you again for writing and I look forward to learning where you feel I got things wrong. Best wishes as you continue to investigate this remarkable intravenous preparation.

Warm regards,
David

Indeed, I really didn’t understand precisely his objections to the content of my post. I was truly interested in how far off I could be, particularly after having published about a dozen basic science and clinical papers on milk thistle. But I didn’t want to argue from a position of authority, particularly since I am not a clinician and the majority of my work was focused on anti-cancer effects of milk thistle compounds, not hepatoprotection from toxic compounds.

So, I went off to my week of ScienceOnline activities and pre-meeting events I was handling for my new day job when this came in:

Hi David,

Thanks for the reply. Will have to pass. If I corrected every blog on the web I would have no livelihood.

Be well,

So, this is interesting. The reader expected me to give him my phone number so he could tell me where the inaccuracies were in my post. But he couldn’t be bothered with providing details and objections in a public forum on my blog comment thread.

I honestly felt as thought I was doing a GoodThing with the original post, raising awareness about one of very few herbal medicines that have utility in an emergency situation and even promoting the ClinicalTrials.gov site for enrollment in this individual’s clinical trial.

But I have my own questions. For example, why would a P.I. list their contact information for a clinical trial under a Yahoo! email account? And why would they object to the content of a blog post yet not be willing to publicly voice their objections.

After all, I am not your [expletive] transcriptionist.

Category: Clinical Trials, Natural Products Chemistry, Natural Products Pharmacology, Pharmacology | 40 Comments

The backstory of a touching moment at ScienceOnline2012

The SXSW and Burning Man of science communication conferences.

The past weekend saw about 457 science communicators of various venues, ages, and ethnicities gather together at the McKimmon Center of North Carolina State University for ScienceOnline2012. Many pixels have been and will be spilled on the unusual nature of this unconference, one with an environment that many of us thought would exist in academic research: mutual support, sharing, acceptance.

Ed Yong at Not Exactly Rocket Science was first out of the gate with a quick and sharp overview of what makes this conference so special, beyond the topics discussed, reiterating his description from last year:

You spend four days in a mental endurance event set in a parallel universe that’s largely similar to this one, except for the fact that all conversations are interesting.

Indeed, I had the chance to revisit with old friends, make new ones, and participate in a community of writers, teachers, filmmakers, and artists who come together and share and teach the best they each have to offer. And the robust discussion, again, just as I expected from academia: respectfully challenging one another even when we disagree, all with the intention of improving the communication of science and engaging anyone interested in appreciating the wonder the world (and distant worlds!) have to offer.

As a local North Carolinian, I generally assist the co-organizers (Anton Zuiker, Bora Zivkovic, and Karyn Traphagen) on a small number of auxiliary activities to show some down-home hospitality to our guests. My minimal contributions were primarily to arrange the Wine Authorities red and white selections for the Friday banquet and working at the new day job on the reception at the NC Museum of Natural Sciences and the new Nature Research Center.

But I was truly excited to help Deep Sea News editor and marine biologist Kevin Zelnio and New York Times reporter Charles Duhigg with a somewhat-more-formal-than-before open mic/talent show at Napper Tandy’s pub in Raleigh (thanks to manager Jen Labenz!).

Continue reading »

Category: Awesomesauce, Blogging community, GoodPeople, Music, North Carolina, ScienceOnline2012, Women in Science and Medicine | 4 Comments

Could tardigrades survive re-entry?

The latest from Phil Plait at his Bad Astronomer blog is that the “doomed Russian space probe” Phobos-Grunt will be crashing back to Earth within a half-hour of this post.

This concise summary was from his post on January 4th:

In November 2011, the Russian space agency launched the much-anticipated Mars probe called Phobos-Grunt (which means “Phobos dirt” or “ground”), which would go to the Red Planet, soft-land a probe on the tiny moon Phobos, and return a sample of the surface to Earth. Unfortunately, the booster that would take it from Earth orbit into a Mars-intercept trajectory failed to fire, stranding the spacecraft in low-Earth orbit. Atmospheric drag has doomed the mission; it will most likely burn up sometime in the next two weeks.

I’ve been following this story a little bit since I learned about the ten species that were being sent up to the Martian moon to learn if living organisms could survive the 3-year, out-and-back journey.

Alas, they can be squished. (See Ed Yong comment below)

The Planetary Society very carefully selected representative prokaryotes, eukaryotes, and archaea as described in the table at their website. One of these was the remarkable tardigrade, represented in this plush toy gift we gave to our daughter this Christmas. My new boss, biologist Meg Lowman, wrote a nice article on the tardigrades for her weekly column in the News & Observer.

These are unusual microscopic multicellular invertebrates that can survive being dried out (dessication) and revived as long as a year later. Their ability to survive hostile conditions where any self-respecting organism would die is the reason they are called extremophiles.

K. Ingemar Jönsson at Kristianistad University in Sweden has been running the Tardigrades in Space (TARDIS) program since 2007 when several species of organisms were successfully returned to Earth from the FOTON-M3 mission and survived exposure to both space vacuum and solar radiation.

But I doubt very much that they will be able to survive directly burning up, sans spacecraft, as Phobos-Grunt disintegrates over the Pacific Ocean within minutes.

Requisat en pace, tardigrades.

Category: Astronomy | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Woman loses arm, shoulder, and breast after “bath salt” injection

Well, let’s get the hat-tips up fron first. My kind friend and autism advocate Liz Ditz at I Speak of Dreams tweeted me last night to point me to a NPR “Shots” blogpost by Nancy Shute, journalisticus awesomeii and current president of the National Association of Science Writers.

Together, these two erudite women have led me to forego having breakfast this morning.

ResearchBlogging.orgShute cited a new report in the journal Orthopedics (free html and PDF) where Dr. Russell Russo and colleagues at the LSU Health Sciences Center in New Orleans describe the case of a 34-year-old woman who presented with a two-day history of a bad swollen and painful forearm. A small red puncture wound was visible and she admitted to injecting herself intramuscularly with a “bath salt” product – intramuscular after she was unable to find vascular access. Sadly, this was a person with a serious substance abuse disorder as she also tested positive for cocaine, opiates (drugs like morphine or OxyContin), and benzodiazepine (drugs like Valium, Klonopin, or Xanax).

Bath salts are the colloquial name for a class of products marketed similarly to synthetic marijuana but very different in chemical composition. While also smoked and snorted, bath salts contain one or more stimulant drugs called synthetic cathinones – specifically mephedrone (or 4-methylmethcathinone, 4-MMC) or MDPV (or methylenedioxypyrovalerone). My neuroscience researcher and blogger colleague DrugMonkey is an authority on these compounds and has written extensively at his blogs. This category search is a good place to start but this single post and its links are best.

The woman’s condition responded briefly overnight to a course of broad-spectrum, intravenous antibiotics (penicillin G and clindamycin).

Then all hell broke loose.


Continue reading »

Category: Drugs of Abuse, Pharmacology, Public Health, Toxicology | 6 Comments

From the Archives: ScienceOnline’09 Winetasting (and a new, alcohol-free PSA)

I had a Twitter exchange last night with ScienceOnline2012 co-organizer Karyn Traphagen about a great upcoming event at the Museum of Life and Science in Durham, NC, the place where she works when not running the behind-the-scenes madness. On February 9, they will be hosting a Science of Wine event and she mused on Twitter as to whether such a thing would be good to have for this year’s ScienceOnline meeting.

The conversation brought back lovely memories of such a similar event I put together for the unconference in 2009. I revived the following post from back then to illustrate the fun community that comes together around SciencesOnline (is that the proper plural form?).

However, I do want to make the point that despite much attention to the ethanolic libations at ScienceOnline (see the #drunksci Twitter hashtag), we are also very sensitive to those who may not wish to consume alcohol for cultural or medical reasons. (FYI, we had Bora walking around the winetasting with his characteristic glass of Coke – the soda, not the alkaloid).

As scientists, we know that 18 million US citizens have an alcohol use disorder, a rate of roughly 6% (source: NIAAA’s Rethinking Drinking). Assuming that rate is roughly the same across all US and international attendees, that means around 30 ScienceOnliners are likely to wish to stay away from alcohol for health reasons – plus those who otherwise don’t drink. Just so those of you know, it’s totally cool and this is a truly accepting and understanding crowd. You’ll still have fun and you will certainly have other compatriots. I have been known to consume large quantities of club soda with lime so you can hang with me.

But for those of you wishing to imbibe, you may care to read a bit about how we’ve approached it in the past, in a responsible and intellectually-satisfying manner. With 56% of this year’s attendees coming for the first time, here’s a little taste – as it were – of the awesomesauce that is ScienceOnline.


This post appeared originally at the ScienceBlogs home of Terra Sigillata on 3 April 2009.

Arikia FF 515px.jpg

Arikia Millikan, then-Intern at ScienceBlogs.com (now gainfully employed Ex-Intern), demonstrates her facility in liveblogging the comparison between two pinot noirs.

So why has it taken me exactly 11 weeks to write this post? I think it’s because once we post it, I have to let go of how awesome this event was. But, this post has been sitting in my queue for way too long. So, now, I must finally tell all regular readers about our proposed live winetasting on 16 January at ScienceOnline’09.


scionline09 small.jpg

As you may know, about 240 science bloggers and associated miscreants gathered in Research Triangle Park, NC, in mid-January to discuss all things about communicating science online. On the opening night of the conference, the Duke University Women in Science and Engineering (WiSE) group sponsored a fantastic talk by journalist, Rebecca Skloot, author of the upcoming book, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, and blogger at Culture Dish.


WineAuthoritahs_275px.jpg

In the hour prior to Rebecca’s talk, I had gathered a couple dozen folks who signed up in advance to join me to compare four really nice wines, selected for the occasion by Craig Heffley (Grand Poobah Wine Swami), co-owner of Wine Authorities, an internationally-recognized Durham, NC, wine merchant and community resource and gathering place.

With his business partner, Seth Gross, away in Austria and Germany on a wine scouting trip (which he blogged), Craig was still generous enough to spend about an hour-and-a-half with me at the store coming up with these selections for The Friday Fermentable Live! The group of 20-25 was comprised of first-time wine tasters and experienced enthusiasts, local Bull City folk and guests from Berlin, Helsinki, and Toronto, youngsters of 22 and others of us, uh, older than 22.

I’ve gotta hand it to Craig for recognizing the wide variety of folks we were trying to please. After much deliberation, we concurred on having a demonstration of Old World and New World wines from the same grape and then show off a nice American red comparison.

Craig suggested a fine American chardonnay to compare with a French white Burgundy:

2005 Lynmar Estate Chardonnay (Russian River Valley, CA) – $33.99
2005 Eric de Suremain, Rully 1er Cru Blanc (Burgundy, France) – $27.99

For the American red, Craig suggested we compare a California pinot noir with that of Oregon, where pinot is doing best in the States.

2007 Alma Rosa Pinot Noir (Santa Rita Hills, CA) – $37.99
2006 Lemelson Pinot Noir, Thea’s Selection (Willamette Valley, Oregon) – $36.99

Burgundy Lynmar.jpg

Yes, yes, I know that these price points are well outside my normally stated goals for postdoc- or grad student-friendly wines but, hell, I was buying and these people are my friends, or at least friends that I hadn’t yet met.

Let it go forth from this time and place: if you come to my town, you get treated well. (My Mom will remember my late father saying to my college friends who I’d bring home, “We don’t want you to go home and tell your family you were at the Kroll’s house and they didn’t give you enough to eat or drink.”)

Tom SO'09 winetasting.jpg

Scicurious held forth on the concept of “legs”: the characteristic of wine that causes it to remain or ride up on the inside of the glass upon swirling. In many cases, this is due to the viscosity of the wine and its glycerol content. This characteristic is often used as a determinant of a wine’s quality. Sadly, some winemakers now add glycerol to their wines to make them appear higher in quality. Damn chemistry!

The chardonnays gave us a chance to talk about other microorganisms used in the fermentation process besides yeast. The process of malolactic fermentation is often used for chardonnay, usually with Oenococcus oeni or a Lactobacillus spp., to “soften” the wine in converting malic acid (a typical apple flavor) to lactic acid (a smoother, milk/cheese flavor). Together with the vanillin extracted by aging in oak barrels, this approach imparts a creamy flavor to the wine.

Pal FF 275px.jpg

Our colleague, PalMD, who knows everything from the pharmacotherapy of sexually-transmitted diseases to writing about the humanity of being a father and physician, pretty much crystallized and moderated the discussion. Not only does the camera love PalMD, but he is exactly the warm soul in person that you would anticipate from his writing. And even though we moderated a session the next day on pseudonymity and building a reputation in blogging, we still did not spend enough time together.

And here is Prof Janet Stemwedel (aka Dr Free-Ride) demonstrating her focus and dedication to the task at hand, appropriately kneeling at the altar of wine:

Janet at FFL by Eva Amsen.jpg
UStream control panel.jpg

About halfway through, the Ex-Intern, Arikia Millikan (featured at the top of the post), reminded me that I had signed up with Ustream.tv to send out live video of the tasting, so caught up was I in the socializing. We did get the session up and were then joined by DrugMonkey, Isis, and Mike Dunford (The Questionable Authority), with GrrlScientist at the controls of the chat board. I have no idea what was said under my username and am glad that the broadcast was not saved to the archives. Next year, I’ll try to be sure to have this working from the start and announce the wines in advance so that all of you could join us.

There is obviously much more to write but I have the good fortune of conducting this winetasting with fellow bloggers. So, many thanks to all who joined us and blogged about our Friday evening:

Adventures in Ethics and Science – Janet Stemwedel – ScienceOnline’09: Live-blogging a Friday Fermentable wine tasting

björn.brembs.blog – Björn Brembs – ScienceOnline09: FridayFermentable liveblogging wine tasting

Deep Thoughts and Silliness – Bob O’Hara – ScienceOnline09: Live-blogging the wine tasting

Expression Patterns – Eva Amsen – Friday Fermentable Liveblog

Fairer Science – Pat Campbell – First wines

Lecturer Notes – Propter Doc – The Friday Fermentable

Sciencewomen – Sciencewoman – Friday night at ScienceOnline

the path forward – leigh – leigh is a busy, busy bee

Thesis – with Children – acmegirl – Liveblogging – with Wine

For those of you interested in more economically approachable wines, Craig also selected the two offerings served for the Duke WiSE reception before Rebecca’s talk, a 2007 Valdesil Godello “Montenovo” (Valdeoras, Spain – $11.99) and a 2007 Altosur Malbec (Tupungato, Mendoza, Argentina – $9.99). Hitting a varied group of nearly 300 attendees for Rebecca’s talk, Craig suggested the Godello not only because it is my new favorite white grape, but because it exhibits the best of many styles without being pigeonholed – a clean balance of the mineral soils of northwestern Spain with white peach and pear flavors. Craig and Seth have also had the Altosur Malbec and Cabernet Sauvignon on their Enomatic and I’m hardpressed to find another $10 bottle of this quality and complexity. Craig suggested we offer the Malbec because, “You never hear anyone say they hate Malbec.” Good enough for me.

Durham renowned.jpg

Finally, for the Saturday night banquet I arranged at the Radisson RTP, headquarters hotel for the conference, I had an ethical responsibility to be sure our guests were not subjected to the hotel house wine, Trinity Oaks, insipid corporate plonk for which they charged $20/bottle. (In contrast, the food was superb and the hotel staff amazingly accommodating to our guests.). Even with the hotel’s $10 corkage fee, Craig helped me bring in two lovely $10 offerings that were far superior for the same $20 total:

2008 Ken Forrester Petit Chenin Blanc (Stellenbosch, South Africa)

2006 Domaine Pinchinat, Venus de Pinchinat Rouge (Provence, France)

I was particularly pleased with these two, especially after the German, Swedish, and M.D. Anderson-trained scientist, Björn Brembs, stopped me the next day to tell me that he and his ladyfriend enjoyed both – high praise from a globetrotting scientist who hails from the only European city where I’ve been invited to speak (Würzburg, Germany) and one of my favorite wine appellations, Franconia.

Anyway, if there is a ScienceOnline’10, I hope to host another wine tasting if for nothing else than to spend some fun time with my valued colleagues, readers, colleagues who have become readers, and readers who have become colleagues.



Photo credits:

Me: Arikia Millikan, PalMD, computer screen

Eva Amsen: Janet Stemwedel

AlexKL: Tom Kibler, Radisson dinner
In fact, Alex has the best collection of photographs from the entire weekend, including several more from the tasting and a superb shot of Rebecca after her talk.

Category: Awesomesauce, Blogging community, GoodPeople, Journalists, Awesome, North Carolina, REPOST, ScienceOnline2012 | Leave a comment

Science Writing Sampler Platter

An exciting part of my new job at the Nature Research Center of the NC Museum of Natural Sciences is that I’ll also have a faculty appointment somewhere in the College of Humanities and Social Sciences (CHASS) at North Carolina State University in Raleigh.

One of my new colleagues is Dr. Cat Warren, Associate Professor of English at State and editor of Academe magazine (and accompanying blog) of the American Association of University Professors.

If all goes well, I’m hoping to be able to contribute to the curriculum for the Master of Science in Technical Communication in the NCSU Department of English.

Cat asked me for a few representative posts to share with my potential new colleagues and I thought I’d put them up here under a single URL. While I do have a sampler over and up to the right – and include one of those posts below – I wanted to provide a more broad overview of my writing from the five blogs where I have a presence.


Continue reading »

Category: Academia, Blogging community, Botany, Chemistry, Dietary Supplements, HeLa, History, Natural Products Chemistry, Natural Products Pharmacology, North Carolina, Pharmacology, Pharmacy, Science Journalism, The American South, The Working Scientist | 1 Comment