The Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, based at the University of York in the UK, has just launched a new initiative for online registration of proposed and ongoing systematic reviews. Those behind the initiative describe in a recent Lancet article the underlying aims of the project — to minimise and discourage publication biases, to encourage publication of full results and transparency of reporting, and to improve overall quality. The effort closely parallels trial registration efforts (eg such as those of World Health Organization’s International Clinical Trial Registry Platform) in proposing, for example, that the forthcoming registry be free to all to access, freely searchable, and open to all registrants worldwide. As for registered trials, new systematic reviews would be given unique registry numbers which could then be used to identify publications emerging from the systematic review. The Centre is currently conducting a Delphi consultation exercise to collect feedback from interested parties as to the scope of the registry, its minimum dataset, and other aspects of how it should work. All those interested in conducting or using systematic reviews should consider providing input to the consultation, which closes 2nd August 2010.
- Book Review: ‘Deadly Medicines and Organised Crime: How Big Pharma Has Corrupted Healthcare’ by Peter Gøtzsche
- Forced to Flee: Humanitarian Disasters Leave Women at Higher Risk
- Looking for $2 Trillion
- Is Viral Load Testing for HIV a Realistic Strategy in Developing Countries?
- Vaccine Hesitancy: A Call for Papers from PLOS Currents: Outbreaks
- Drugs for the Poor, Drugs for the Rich: Why the Current R&D Model Doesn’t Deliver
TopicsAfrica antimicrobial drugs antiretroviral treatment cardiovascular health child health china clinical trials developing world diarrhea environment Ghostwriting global burden of disease global health guidelines health costs health information health policy health systems HIV HIV/AIDS influenza LMICs malaria maternal and perinatal health maternal health medical literature medical students Mental Health mortality MSF neglected tropical diseases open access pharmaceutical industry Policy public health reporting research ethics sanitation sub-saharan Africa systematic reviews tobacco tuberculosis vaccine water WHO