Contributors to the Pediatric Obesity Epidemic Part 2: Changes in Food Intake

Image Courtesy of the Canadian Obesity Network Image Gallery

Welcome to Part 2 in a series on potential contributors to the pediatric obesity epidemic. This series is based on a recent paper in the journal ISRN Pediatrics, which is available for free here.  Big thanks to the University of Ottawa Author Fund for covering the Open Access publication costs.

Throughout the week we will examine the following potential contributors to the pediatric obesity epidemic:

  • Reduced sleep
  • Reduced physical activity
  • Increased total energy intake
  • Increased fat intake
  • Increased sedentary time
  • Exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals
  • Increased consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages
  • Inadequate calcium intake
  • Increased maternal age
  • Reduced breastfeeding
  • Increased adult obesity rate

In Part 1 we examined the impact of changes in physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Today we look at the evidence (or lack thereof) linking total energy intake, fat intake, sugar sweetened beverage intake, and calcium intake with the childhood obesity epidemic. To skip to Part 3, which focuses on sleep, maternal age, and pollution, click here.

Increased Total Energy Intake

It is well established that intentional overfeeding results in significant weight gain [4648]. For example, Levine and colleagues report that overfeeding volunteers by 1000 kcal/day results in an average weight gain of 5 kg in just 8 weeks [47]. However, counterintuitively, recent reviews have noted that total EI has not been a consistent predictor of weight gain in prospective studies of children [1949]. It is worth noting however that this may be due to the limitations of self- or parent-reported caloric intake, as both adults and children are known to have great difficulty in accurately reporting EI [5052]. For example, Huang and colleagues report that fully 55% of children aged 3–19 who participated in the Continuing Surveys of Food Intakes by Individuals study reported physiologically implausible values for energy intake, and that excluding these individuals resulted in dramatic improvements in both the strength and the consistency of the relationship between EI and body weight [52].

As with PA, there is currently little information regarding historical trends in the EI of Canadian children, and data from the United States are equivocal as some [5356], but not all [5758], studies report increased EI during the past half century. For example, self-reported energy intake from the 1977-1978 Nationwide Food Consumption Survey and the 1999–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey suggest that the average daily EI of American children aged 1–10 in 1999–2004 was 15% higher than in 1977-1978, with similar increases observed in adolescents [5455]. In contrast to these findings, however, Troiano and colleagues report that between 1970 and 1994, EI in American youth was relatively stable [57]. Thus, given the absence of Canadian data and the ambiguity of available data from our closest neighbour, there is currently insufficient evidence to conclude that EI has increased in Canadian youth during recent decades.

While prospective studies and historical trends may lend only weak support to the putative role played by EI in the Canadian childhood obesity epidemic, it remains extremely plausible biologically. As mentioned earlier, several trials have shown that intentional overfeeding results in dramatic weight gain in adults [4648], and there is little reason to expect this relationship to be different in children. While it should be noted that there is evidence that over-consumption results in compensatory increases in EE in some individuals, [47], this would likely be insufficient to prevent an increase in obesity rates at the population level. Further, other consistent predictors of weight gain which lend themselves to more accurate self-reporting than total EI (e.g., television watching and sugar-sweetened beverages, which will be discussed below) are thought to exert their influence through their impact on EI. Thus, despite the weak evidence presented from observational studies, the strong biological plausibility and impressive results from studies of chronic overfeeding suggest that there is currently moderate evidence that increased EI has contributed to the childhood obesity epidemic.

Increased Sugar Sweetened Beverage Intake

While trends in total EI over the past 40 years are unclear, there is little ambiguity for trends in sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake, which has increased dramatically in recent decades [5860]. For example, the average self-reported soft-drink intake in American youth increased from roughly 150 mL/day in 1977 to more than 350 mL/day in 1998 [59], and recent studies suggest that total SSB intake has continued to increase into the 21st century [60]. Interestingly, while this may be partially due to increased fast food consumption, available evidence suggests that SSB intake has also increased in the home environment in recent decades [56].

Several recent systematic reviews have also concluded that there is consistent evidence that excess consumption of SSBs is associated with an elevated risk of weight gain [196162]. For example, among longitudinal studies, Vartanian and colleagues report significant effect sizes of 0.24 and 0.09 for the relationship of SSB consumption with total EI and body weight, respectively [62]. Similarly, a 19-month prospective study of 548 school children reports that every serving of sugar-sweetened beverages at baseline was associated with a 0.18 kg/m2 increase in BMI at followup [63]. Finally, it has recently been estimated that removing sugar-sweetened beverages from the diet of American children and youth would reduce caloric intake by an average of 235 calories per day [64], which has the potential to dramatically reduce the risk of positive energy balance in this age group. Thus, available evidence suggests that excessive consumption of SSBs plays a strong role in the etiology of the childhood obesity epidemic.

This relationship between SSB and prospective weight gain can be explained by multiple biological mechanisms. First and foremost, SSB intake is associated with increased EI, as described earlier [62]. This is likely due to the fact that SSBs are both energy dense and have little impact on satiety, both of which could lead to increases in EI [61]. Further, many SSBs are sweetened with high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) and therefore contain a fructose fraction. This fructose fraction may also contribute to weight gain through increased lipogenesis, inhibition of satiety signals, and reductions in EE, although it should be noted that the relative importance of HFCS in the etiology of obesity is still a matter of dispute [6165].

Increased Fat Intake

Not surprisingly, as the consumption of carbohydrates has increased during the past 30 years, the relative contribution of fat to total EI has decreased, although intake remains above recommendations [5758]. For example, Cavadini and colleagues report that between 1965 and 1996 fat intake decreased from 39% to 32% of EI for Americans aged 11–18 [58]. However, it should be noted that this same study found that absolute fat intake actually increased by 4% during the 1990’s [58], suggesting that the relative changes in fat intake may have more to do with increased consumption of carbohydrates than with reductions in fat consumption.

The evidence linking fat intake and obesity in prospective studies is surprisingly equivocal and provides little support for the role of fat intake in the development of obesity [19]. For example, Davis and colleagues report that of 15 longitudinal studies of childhood weight gain reviewed by the American Dietetic Association, just 4 supported the role of dietary fat intake, while 4 others showed mixed results, and 7 found no association [19]. However, as with total EI, fat intake remains an extremely plausible mechanism biologically. Similar to SSBs, dietary fat is both energy dense and relatively nonsatiating per calorie ingested, lending itself to passive overconsumption [66]. Further, increased fat consumption appears to have little impact on fat oxidation or overall EE, suggesting that excess EI related to increased fat intake is very likely to result in positive energy balance and weight gain [67]. However, despite these plausible mechanistic links, available evidence provides only weak support of the role of dietary fat intake in the current childhood obesity epidemic.

Reduced Calcium Intake

Along with the changes in fat and SSB intake in recent decades, there has also been a well-documented reduction in the intake of dietary calcium [5868]. For example, between 1965 and 1996, Cavadini et al. report that the milk consumption of American youth decreased by 36%, while total calcium intake dropped by roughly 13% [58]. Further, it has been suggested that high calcium intake may influence body weight through increases in fecal fat excretion, fat oxidation, and thermogenesis [6970]. However, a recent meta-analysis of childhood calcium supplementation studies reports no significant association between supplementation and any measure of weight or body composition [71], which is supported by the findings of a similar review in adults [72]. Thus, while there is some evidence for plausible mechanisms linking reduced calcium with increased adiposity, the lack of evidence linking calcium intake with changes in actual measures of body composition suggests that reductions in calcium intake do not represent an important cause of the Canadian childhood obesity epidemic.

Coming Up Next

Come back tomorrow (now online here), when we’ll look at the potential role played by reduced sleep, pollutants, increased maternal age, breastfeeding, and adult obesity.

Travis

ResearchBlogging.orgSaunders, T. (2011). Potential Contributors to the Canadian Pediatric Obesity Epidemic ISRN Pediatrics, 2011, 1-10 DOI: 10.5402/2011/917684

46. C. Bouchard, A. Tremblay, J. P. Despres et al., “The response to long-term overfeeding in identical twins,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 322, no. 21, pp. 1477–1482, 1990.

47. J. A. Levine, N. L. Eberhardt, and M. D. Jensen, “Role of nonexercise activity thermogenesis in resistance to fat gain in humans,” Science, vol. 283, no. 5399, pp. 212–214, 1999.

48. N. G. Norgan and J. V. G. A. Durnin, “The effect of 6 weeks of overfeeding on the body weight, body composition, and energy metabolism of young men,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 978–988, 1980.

49. L. A. Moreno and G. Rodríguez, “Dietary risk factors for development of childhood obesity,”Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 336–341, 2007.

50. J. Pomerleau, T. Østbye, and E. Bright-See, “Potential underreporting of energy intake in the Ontario Health Survey and its relationship with nutrient and food intakes,” European Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 553–557, 1999.

51. C. M. Champagne, N. B. Baker, J. P. DeLany, D. W. Harsha, and G. A. Bray, “Assessment of energy intake underreporting by doubly labeled water and observations on reported nutrient intakes in children,” Journal of the American Dietetic Association, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 426–430, 1998.

52. T. T. K. Huang, N. C. Howarth, B. H. Lin, S. B. Roberts, and M. A. McCrory, “Energy intake and meal portions: associations with BMI percentile in U.S. children,” Obesity Research, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1875–1885, 2004.

53. S. J. Nielsen, A. M. Siega-Riz, and B. M. Popkin, “Trends in energy intake in U.S. between 1977 and 1996: similar shifts seen across age groups,” Obesity Research, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 370–378, 2002.

54. Y. K. Park and E. A. Yetley, “Intakes and food sources of fructose in the United States,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 737S–747S, 1993.

55. B. P. Marriott, N. Cole, and E. Lee, “National estimates of dietary fructose intake increased from 1977 to 2004 in the United States,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 139, no. 6, pp. 1228S–1235S, 2009.

56. S. J. Nielsen and B. M. Popkin, “Patterns and trends in food portion sizes, 1977–1998,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 289, no. 4, pp. 450–453, 2003.

57. R. P. Troiano, R. R. Briefel, M. D. Carroll, and K. Bialostosky, “Energy and fat intakes of children arid adolescents in the United States: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 1343S–1353S, 2000.

58. C. Cavadini, A. M. Siega-Riz, and B. M. Popkin, “US adolescent food intake trends from 1965 to 1996,” Archives of Disease in Childhood, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 18–24, 2000.

59. S. A. French, B. H. Lin, and J. F. Guthrie, “National trends in soft drink consumption among children and adolescents age 6 to 17 years: prevalence, amounts, and sources, 1977/1978 to 1994/1998,” Journal of the American Dietetic Association, vol. 103, no. 10, pp. 1326–1331, 2003.

60. Y. C. Wang, S. N. Bleich, and S. L. Gortmaker, “Increasing caloric contribution from sugar- sweetened beverages and 100% fruit juices among US children and adolescents, 1988–2004,”Pediatrics, vol. 121, no. 6, pp. e1604–e1614, 2008.

61. V. S. Malik, M. B. Schulze, and F. B. Hu, “Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 274–288, 2006.

62. D. S. Ludwig, K. E. Peterson, and S. L. Gortmaker, “Relation between consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks and childhood obesity: a prospective, observational analysis,” The Lancet, vol. 357, no. 9255, pp. 505–508, 2001.

63. Y. C. Wang, D. S. Ludwig, K. Sonneville, and S. L. Gortmaker, “Impact of change in sweetened caloric beverage consumption on energy intake among children and adolescents,” Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, vol. 163, no. 4, pp. 336–343, 2009.

64. K. L. Stanhope and P. J. Havel, “Endocrine and metabolic effects of consuming beverages sweetened with fructose, glucose, sucrose, or high-fructose corn syrup,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 1733S–1737S, 2008.

65. J. E. Blundell and J. I. Macdiarmid, “Fat as a risk factor for overconsumption: satiation, satiety, and patterns of eating,” Journal of the American Dietetic Association, vol. 97, no. 7, pp. S63–S69, 1997.

66. G. A. Bray and B. M. Popkin, “Dietary fat intake does affect obesity,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 1157–1173, 1998.

67. S. J. Nielsen and B. M. Popkin, “Changes in beverage intake between 1977 and 2001,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 205–210, 2004.

68. A. Tremblay and J. P. Chaput, “About unsuspected potential determinants of obesity,” Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 791–796, 2008.

69. G. C. Major, J. P. Chaput, M. Ledoux et al., “Recent developments in calcium-related obesity research,” Obesity Reviews, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 428–445, 2008.

70. T. Winzenberg, K. Shaw, J. Fryer, and G. Jones, “Calcium supplements in healthy children do not affect weight gain, height, or body composition,” Obesity, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 1789–1798, 2007.

71. L. R. Vartanian, M. B. Schwartz, and K. D. Brownell, “Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 667–675, 2007.

72. R. Trowman, J. C. Dumville, S. Hahn, and D. J. Torgerson, “A systematic review of the effects of calcium supplementation on body weight,” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 1033–1038, 2006

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Creative Commons License
The Contributors to the Pediatric Obesity Epidemic Part 2: Changes in Food Intake by Obesity Panacea, unless otherwise expressly stated, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

This entry was posted in News, nutrition, Obesity Research, Peer Reviewed Research, Series. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Contributors to the Pediatric Obesity Epidemic Part 2: Changes in Food Intake

  1. Pingback: Contributors to the Pediatric Obesity Epidemic Part 1: Energy Balance, Physical Activity & Sedentary Behaviour | Obesity Panacea

  2. Pingback: Contributors to the Pediatric Obesity Epidemic Part 3: Sleep, Maternal Age, Pollution & Breastfeeding | Obesity Panacea

  3. Pingback: Contributors to the Pediatric Obesity Epidemic Part 4: Adult Obesity, and Relative Contributions of All Risk Factors | Obesity Panacea

  4. Cynthia says:

    I quote from your post: “The evidence linking fat intake and obesity in prospective studies is surprisingly equivocal and provides little support for the role of fat intake in the development of obesity [19]. For example, Davis and colleagues report that of 15 longitudinal studies of childhood weight gain reviewed by the American Dietetic Association, just 4 supported the role of dietary fat intake, while 4 others showed mixed results, and 7 found no association [19]. However, as with total EI, fat intake remains an extremely plausible mechanism biologically.”
    How is it that study after study has difficulty proving the relationship between eating fat and obesity and yet everyone continues to believe fat is a culprit??? Chubby boys often become slim at puberty, girls sometimes gain weight at puberty, slim women gain weight at menopause – that is hormonal …. we are not closed systems that simply need more or less energy to gain or lose weight …. when will researchers finally admit this????
    I also dispute what you say about satiety and fat – I am always much more satisfied after a meal of non-lean meat & vegetables than I am after I eat pasta, rice or potatoes – I think there are studies about this too.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Travis Saunders, MSc, CEP says:

      Good question Cynthia. One reason why it’s hard to tell whether or not fat intake causes people to gain weight is because it’s very hard to measure fat intake. Most studies simply ask people how much fat they eat, and that makes it very difficult to draw firm conclusions.

      Unfortunately the vast majority of chubby kids do not become skinny as they age. Nor can hormonal changes explain the obesity epidemic, unless our hormones are dramatically different now than they were 50-60 years ago.

      As to your other point, I agree that 1lb of fat is more satiating than 1lb of carbs. But what matters is how satiating something is *per calorie*. And since 1lb of fat has more than twice the number of calories as 1lb of carbs, the carbs are actually more satiating per calorie. Meat also has a lot of protein which, and veggies have lots of fiber, both of which can also increase satiety.

      VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  5. Cynthia says:

    Hi Travis – thanks for the response….I guess I have too many things to say… I really wasn’t disagreeing that child obesity is a problem – I sadly see lots of those tubby toddlers growing up into obese teenagers. My only quibble is with fat intake being considered a culprit when so many studies aren’t sure that it is. It is really is a different topic.
    As for the childhood obesity problem… More research isn’t usually a bad thing but the cause of this particular problem really isn’t that hard to figure out. Children eat too much sugar, white flour and non-nutritious, highly processed food – that and a slow down in activity are the main differences between today’s children and the way, my parents and grandparents and I ate and behaved in our childhoods. Give the kids simple home made food, cut out the junk, pop and fruit juice and most of the problem would be licked. Bring back phys ed, and allow for more free, non-organized activities away from school and the rest of the problem would be licked. And don’t tell me that people are too busy to cook – it is not that difficult or time-consuming to put a decent meal on the table.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)