On Racism and Sexism and the Benefit of the Doubt

I show this video clip from The Daily Show with Jon Stewart when I teach introductory anthropology classes on race and racism. It captures one subtle way race and racism works in US society today, rather than the older paradigmatic examples of Jim Crow laws and the segregation of society. Plus it’s funny, so students often tune into what is being said even when it’s uncomfortable.

I’m posting the clip here because I think it’s relevant to the debate happening online about gender, race, and class in the world of science blogging. Who gets the benefit of the doubt? Who doesn’t?

Update: For better or worse, a case has come up which illustrates “the benefit of the doubt” vividly – Danielle Lee, who didn’t get it on Friday from Scientific American, and Bora Zivkovic, who runs the Scientific American blog network and who has confirmed allegations of “inappropriate” behavior with at least one woman that date back to incidents that happened over a year ago.

Back to original: And for those looking for a good round-up of developments on what has happened with the case of Dr. Danielle Lee, Scientific American blogs, and #standingwithDNLee, please see the post by Maryn McKenna, On Clarity, Dignity, Apologies and Moving Forward.

Finally, this post from neuroscientist student Rim In the end, let’s make sure something good comes out gives an important point-of-view piece on why these controversies matter.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Creative Commons License
The On Racism and Sexism and the Benefit of the Doubt by Neuroanthropology, unless otherwise expressly stated, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

This entry was posted in Critique, Gender, Society. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to On Racism and Sexism and the Benefit of the Doubt

  1. Pingback: On Racism and Sexism and the Benefit of the Dou...

  2. No Racist Anthropology says:

    Racist comments about Black women by Daddyio7 in this comment stream prove your point, Daniel:
    http://tenureshewrote.wordpress.com/2013/11/14/guest-post-what-happens-when-trivial-sexism-is-ignored/.

    Just like denial by many White anthropologists who were told by a Black woman about Berkeley’s hostile racial climate for Black students. No benefit of the doubt. But the November 6-12, 2013 East Bay Express cover story confirmed what those in denial doubted. And the LA Times has recently confirmed UCLA has been covering up racial harassment complaints by professors. Interesting how Chris Kelty/Savage Minds/Paul Rabinow are not offering an apologies for existing a silly Black woman didn’t know what she was talking about. So like you said, interesting who does and doesn’t get the benefit if the doubt–as well as public support.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>