Dame Anne Salmond: A Change of Heart

Dame Anne Salmond, the esteemed New Zealand historian and writer and Professor of Maori Studies and Anthropology at the University of Auckland, has written an impassioned essay in the New Zealand Herald: We Could Do with a Change of Heart.

The “invisible hand” of the market, first conceived in the Enlightenment but coupled at that time with notions of justice, human dignity and “the rights of man”, has failed to deliver prosperity and happiness, in New Zealand as elsewhere.

The problem, it seems, is a loss of balance. In the pursuit of profit, everything in the world – the earth itself, other species, knowledge and indeed, other people – has been turned into a “resource” to be exploited, often without care or conscience.

In the process, ideas of justice, truth and the common good have been undermined. Without these bulwarks, democracy falters, capitalism fails to share wealth and the distribution of income shifts dangerously out of kilter.

Since the 1990s, income inequality in New Zealand has soared.

In the midst of successive financial crises, the hand of the market still harvests wealth for the wealthy. While the richest avoid taxation, billions can be found to shore up the corporate sector, but not to deal with child poverty, third-world diseases, high rates of youth incarceration and suicide, and other indicators of suffering and failure.

There is more to her essay as op-ed, so please do read We could do with a change of heart in its entirety.

For more on Anne Salmond, the New Zealand Book Council provides an extensive and insightful profile. Her latest book looks fascinating: Aphrodite’s Island: The European Discovery of Tahiti.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
This entry was posted in Critique, Inequality, Society. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Dame Anne Salmond: A Change of Heart

  1. vamm says:

    one problem, to do with income structure, is that the tv news media and the politicians are all on pretty high incomes, so they’ll socialize/schmooz with people of like kind. i mean, the mannerisms, the clothes, the haircuts you see on the 6pm news, the way they talk, the way they think, the stories they cover… they dont have a clue about the other half. they come over cutesy and smug, even in their earnest. they help nz’s poor be so invisible. and, radio NZ, it’s great, but john hawkesby doing regular slots about what wine to drink with what food, frankly on radio NZ that’s inappropiate; that’s tone deaf. why don’t they do a slot on recipes on a supertight budget? again, who’s visible and who’s invisible?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>