Today I posted a document that should help define a set of principles for scientific attribution. These principles will be presented and discussed at the National Science Foundation workshop Changing the Conduct of Science in the Information Age on November 12. Many people helped me with this document (Cameron Neylon in particular), and I welcome comments and suggestions.
Latest from the PLoGsters
- Can you build up tolerance to delicious foods? in Obesity Panacea
- Download the (e-book) Universe in Speakeasy Science
- On rice and arsenic in Speakeasy Science
- Stop the cycle? Stop the ridiculous commercial in Obesity Panacea
- Embodiment and Breast Cancer Screening in Neuroanthropology
- SciWriteLabs 7.3: Long-form narratives, crappy first drafts, and the importance of wasting time in The Panic Virus
- Call for Papers: Drugs, Borders, and Anthropology in Neuroanthropology
- Congratulations to Dr Stephanie Prince-Ware in Obesity Panacea
- The Curious (Toxic) Chemistry of Chocolate in Speakeasy Science
- Short Courses on Research Methods in Anthropology - Deadline Extended! in Neuroanthropology
-
Recent Posts
- Crowdsourcing the analysis of scholarly tweets
- Reference Manager Papers now available for Windows
- Figshare: Interview with Mark Hahnel
- The Personalized Journal
- Zotero 3.0 Released
- Say Hello to F1000 Research
- Altmetrics – Where Do We Go From Here?
- Sloan Foundation funds Columbia and Mendeley to develop a Citation-Style Language Editor
- Altmetrics to go – mobile version of ScienceCard available
- CrowdoMeter goes Mobile
Recent Comments
- Crowdsourcing the Analysis and Impact of Scholarly Tweets « BioMed 2.0 on CrowdoMeter – or trying to understand tweets about journal papers
- Crowdsourcing the analysis of scholarly tweets | Gobbledygook on Figshare: Interview with Mark Hahnel
- Crowdsourcing the analysis of scholarly tweets | Gobbledygook on CrowdoMeter – or trying to understand tweets about journal papers
- Fusion for professional writing? | Appunti di lavoro on Introducing Annotum to WordPress Bloggers
- The Personalized Journal | Gobbledygook on CrowdoMeter – or trying to understand tweets about journal papers
Blogroll
- business|bytes|genes|molecules
- EASE Journal Blog
- Embargo Watch
- Go To Hellman
- iPhylo
- Laika's MedLibLog
- Michael Nielsen
- Nobel Intent
- O'Really?
- OncoChat
- Reciprocal Space
- Science Blogging in Theory and Practice
- Science in the open
- The Book of Trogool
- The Scholarly Kitchen
- The Tree of Life
- Trading knowledge


Pingback: Quick Links | A Blog Around The Clock
Perhaps it’s just my particular gripe, (and not directly related to your suggestions) but I wish more science bloggers would cite their images. The illustrations used are often completely uncredited, as if they are unimportant embellishments to the articles. Yet an illustrator has gone to school, is scientifically literate and works hard to contribute, and receives no credit.
Drives me bonkers.
Glendon, thanks for the reminder. I will try to do a better job citing the images I use. I’ve also left a comment on your blog.
My complaint wasn’t pointed at you Martin; it’s just something that’s always kind of baffled me.
And thanks for the comment as well.
And here is the link to Glendon’s post. An interesting discussion on the topic has started over there.