Don’t give up

Sixty-one percent of my fellow North Carolinians think that homosexuals should not have the right to get married or form civil partnerships. Never mind that gay marriage was already illegal in the Tar Heel State.

Living in a relative oasis of open-mindedness like Durham can make one complacent. “Obama took NC in 2008,” I said to myself. “How could we possibly deny an oppressed group of people their civil rights?” But in the sober light of day I feel like a chump for entertaining such a utopian fantasy.

Fran Lebowitz has questioned why this issue in particular is so important: “It seems to me that these are the two most confining institutions on the planet: marriage and the military. Why would you be beating down the doors to get in? Usually a fight for freedom is a fight for freedom. This is the opposite…People used to pretend to be gay to get out of going in the army.”

That’s dark and funny and also true. But of course gay people’s desire to get married ultimately has less to do with the institution of marriage and more to do with wanting to be measured by the same normative yardstick as heterosexuals, whatever the merits of that yardstick might or might not be.  Marriage is hard and divorce is common. Serving in the military has obvious risks and all too often, tragic outcomes. For better or worse, these are the institutions we associate with “freedom.”

Be that as it may, I am proud to say that, in the wake of last night’s vote, my own employer immediately announced that it would continue to offer same-sex partner benefits to its faculty and staff, as it has since 1994.  Such benefits do not an egalitarian society make, but that does not make them any less necessary.

Until the homophobic generation dies off or capitulates, there is nothing to do but continue the fight. And so we will.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
This entry was posted in political science, privacy en fuego, You embarrass yourself. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Don’t give up

  1. N says:

    I am curious why you would post an editorial comment in these blogs. After all the tag line under the banner is [i]“Diverse Perspectives on Science and Medicine”[/i].

    It at least seems to me that if this subject is to be discussed in these pages it needs to be reconciled with that foundation of this blog site. What you have written, in my view, needs to be submitted to North Carolina newspapers and various other news, politics, and online magazines.

    The problem facing science and medicine today is that they are too closely allying themselves with the political world. It is tempting to do so as grants for research, facilities, studies frequently come from taxpayers through politicians.

    But the political world frequently plays to peoples weaknesses in order for its leaders to gain the power they crave. If science is not careful they find themselves encourage to shave the facts in ways the politicians desire.

    So far, in reading PLoSBlogs it has not seemed to offer diverse perspectives on science and medicine. PLoSBlogs does have a perspective, but how much of it has to do with science and medicine is debatable.