Soda, beer, and BPA (and hey, congrats to Canada!)

Canada deserves a big pat on the back: On Wednesday, our northerly neighbor added bisphenol A (BPA) to its list of known toxic substances. Canada still has to iron out how it will regulate the chemical, but this is definitely a step in the right direction. (Bryan Walsh over at Time just posted a great piece about this, too—among other things he explains why BPA is “a litmus test for environmental health and for risk tolerance.”)

Let me use this news as an excuse to talk some more about my (least) favorite chemical. (You knew it would happen.) We’ve known for a while where BPA hides—canned goods, polycarbonate bottles, and receipts, among other things. But how do these each contribute to our overall body BPA burden?

study published in March in the Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology strived to answer just this question. Researchers at the University of Maryland and Penn State College of Medicine analyzed data from the 2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and found that people who had the most BPA in their bodies also happened to consume the most soda, school lunches, and meals prepared outside the home—suggesting that these items might well be big culprits. Bottled water did not make a big difference (which makes sense: purchased bottled waters aren’t made from polycarbonate—it’s the hard re-usable bottles that are.)

School lunches and restaurant food make total sense to me: I’m guessing both rely on canned products to conserve cost. Last time I went to a Middle Eastern restaurant, for instance, I saw huge tins of canned chick peas lining the walls. It made me think twice about eating their hummus (but in the end, I did anyway—who can turn that stuff down?).

As for soda: I feel dumb, but I’ve never really thought of it as a BPA culprit. When I think of the “canned goods” that contain BPA, I tend to think about canned peaches and canned beans, not Coke or Sprite! But of course: BPA lines these cans, too, and Americans drink so damned much of the stuff, it’s bound to be a big contributor. Indeed, a study published by Canadian researchers in August in the Journal of Food Protection found BPA in every single sample of soda they collected from cans (and none in soda collected from bottles). Interestingly, they also found BPA in canned beer: yet another problem I hadn’t even thought about. Budweiser, you’re bad for us for so many reasons.

Citations:

LaKind, J., & Naiman, D. (2010). Daily intake of bisphenol A and potential sources of exposure: 2005–2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology DOI: 10.1038/jes.2010.9

Cao XL, Corriveau J, & Popovic S (2010). Sources of low concentrations of bisphenol A in canned beverage products. Journal of food protection, 73 (8), 1548-51 PMID: 20819371

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Creative Commons License
Soda, beer, and BPA (and hey, congrats to Canada!) by Body Politic, unless otherwise expressly stated, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.

This entry was posted in Chemicals, Food and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Soda, beer, and BPA (and hey, congrats to Canada!)

  1. This is blowing my mind. Hasn’t BPA been linked to obesity? If so, doesn’t this mean that every time we suck down a can of coke, we’re getting a double shot of obesogenic agents?

    Seriously, when are they going to start taxing this stuff like cigarettes.

  2. Yup. Blows my mind too…

  3. LH says:

    I wish someone would publish on whether there’s BPA in the plastic microwave trays that all Lean Cuisine and other frozen entrees are both packed and heated in. Any info?

  4. Pingback: Quick Links | A Blog Around The Clock

  5. Skeptic says:

    Hello,

    As someone involved in environmental health myself, I have been following the BPA controversy from north of the 49th parallel with some interest. I have often wondered whether the actual data supports regulation of BPA. The first study you cite, for example, hides this line in its discussion: “Thus, median and 95th percentile intake estimates were approximately two to three orders of magnitude below the current health-based guidance value. This result is similar to that given by Ye et al. (2009) for a cohort of Norwegian women, with the estimated average daily intakes of BPA reported to be about three orders of magnitude lower than the RfD and TDI.”

    What is your take?

  6. Hi LH—Lean Cuisine says that their trays are made of polyethylene terephthalate (PET). I’m pretty sure that does not have BPA in it. But I don’t know whether there might be other health risks associated with it, unfortunately. A paper in Environmental Health Perspectives suggests that PET might leach other types of endocrine disruptors, but it seems there’s little concrete evidence. The fact that it has the word “phthalate” in its name makes me think it might leach phthalates, which have been linked to birth defects in boys and obesity, but again, I’m just not sure.

  7. Pingback: In Defense of Hippie Cigarettes : The Last Word On Nothing