PLOS BLOGS Book Corner
Blogger Tweets
sethmnookin: Agree 100%. “@PeteAbe: Maybe it'll work out. But hate that idea. He's finally swinging well, let him swing.”
EmilyAnthes: HA! (Also: Sad.) RT @Sci_Phile "Homeopaths Without Borders" should be called "Visitors Without Medicine" http://t.co/kXPg8M76hW
TravisSaunders: Full text of very cool new paper posted to the #SBRN website http://t.co/vsrF3kuDB2
hillaryrosner: @MattLuizza My pleasure. Like the use of the Twitter training. :)
stevesilberman: @ReedRoberts Indeed.
daniel_lende: RT @aroepstorff: Jim Wilce, Semiotics of Authenticity at IMC, discusses the Finnish lament revival. Strong films of collective crying http:…
mfenner: RT @BDataScientist: RT @shukla: Great perspectives from Kaggle CEO: Data Science Is Now a Job Market Based Entirely on Merit http://t.co/9…
MrEpid: All hail Darth Atif! The most badass Wookie Sith Lord of all time! @avspacemuseum #starwars #notbad http://t.co/TfhqHHQbgL
BethSkw: RT @susanorlean: I didn't write much this week but I worried a lot about writing. That counts, doesn't it?
Jason_Reads: Enjoy: angry amazon reviews of adorable dog costumes: http://t.co/Ayycpke1LP
jeancflanagan: Just watched “The Revisionaries” on Netflix - a look at the people behind the culture wars in the Texas Board of Education.
Blog Archives
SciWriteLabs #2: Reuters’ Ivan Oransky and Wired’s Adam Rogers on sources v. subjects & more on the factchecking debate
By Seth Mnookin
Posted: October 20, 2011
Posted: October 20, 2011
Category: Journalism, Science, SciWriteLabs
|
Tagged Adam Rogers, David Kroll, Embargo Watch, factchecking, Ivan Oransky, NYU, Rebecca Skloot, Retraction Watch, Reuters, SHERP, Vincent Racaniello, wikipedia, Wired
|
Leave a comment
