This Week in PLoS Medicine: Competing interests and bias; PPROM; Gaps in health research

Bookmark and Share

Image Credit: US National Archives

Closing out our April publishing month, PLoS Medicine publishes three new articles, including the monthly editorial which revisits conflicts of interest policies.

The PLoS Medicine Editors discuss financial conflicts of interest at the American Psychiatric Association, and raise concerns about new evidence from the social sciences that suggests conflict of interest disclosures worsen rather than ameliorate bias.

In a randomized controlled trial David van der Ham and colleagues investigate induction of labor versus expectant management for women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes.

As part of a cluster of articles leading up to the 2012 World Health Report and critically reflecting on the theme of “no health without research,” Martin McKee and colleagues examine the question of what to do to build capacity in the many countries around the world where health research is virtually non-existent.

Remember you can comment on, annotate and rate any PLoS Medicine article and see the views, citations and other indications of impact of an article on that articles metrics tab.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Creative Commons License
This Week in PLoS Medicine: Competing interests and bias; PPROM; Gaps in health research by PLOS Blogs Network, unless otherwise expressly stated, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This entry was posted in PLoS Medicine Week by Week and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.