Biologue Search
-
Popular Posts
- Why I love the H-index
- Openly Streamlining Peer Review
- Scientific misconduct allegations: tell me, what would you do?
- Wanted: community ideas about the future of PLOS Biology
- Working to increase diversity of PLOS Biology Academic Editors and Advisory Board members
- We want you to design the 2013 PLOS Computational Biology T-shirt!
- Opening Up Data Access, Not Just Articles
- Dude, Where's My Data?
- Let's Make Those Book Chapters Open Too!
- Playing Roulette with Seven Sexes
-
Recent Posts
- This week in PLOS Biology
- Deep Reads: Christine Weber reflects on lab life and becoming a scientist
- This Week in PLOS Biology
- Wearable science: The 2014 PLOS Comp Biol T-shirt competition
- The dynamical relationship of brain structure and function, environmental factors affecting autism and a budgie’s flight path: the PLOS Comp Biol March issue
Recent Comments
- Christine Weber on Deep Reads: Christine Weber reflects on lab life and becoming a scientist
- Alma Reyes on Will Stem Cell Therapy Help Cure Spinal Cord Injury?
- Ricki Lewis on Deep Reads: Christine Weber reflects on lab life and becoming a scientist
- Why we don’t sign our peer reviews | The Molecular Ecologist on Openly Streamlining Peer Review
- Attila Becskei on An Invitation to Contribute to the Second Life of the Synthetic Biology Collection
Archive
Categories
Monthly Archives: July 2013
It’s official – the animal study literature is biased… but whose fault is it?
Category: Biology, Blog, Data, Funding, Neuroscience, PLOS Biology, Publishing, Research, Review
4 Comments
