Biologue Search
-
Popular Posts
- Why I love the H-index
- Scientific misconduct allegations: tell me, what would you do?
- Openly Streamlining Peer Review
- Wanted: community ideas about the future of PLOS Biology
- Working to increase diversity of PLOS Biology Academic Editors and Advisory Board members
- We want you to design the 2013 PLOS Computational Biology T-shirt!
- Opening Up Data Access, Not Just Articles
- Dude, Where's My Data?
- Let's Make Those Book Chapters Open Too!
- PLOS Data Policy: Update
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Evening Ebola Update, Thurs, 1/22: | Dr. Bob's Blog on Media response: forecasting diseases using Wikipedia
- Keeping up with the Jobses: the role of technology in reproducible research - On Biology on PLOS Data Policy: Update
- On Biology Keeping up with the Jobses: the role of technology in reproducible research on PLOS Data Policy: Update
- Kevin on This week in PLOS Biology
- This week in PLOS Biology - PLOS Biologue on Publishing to Keep up with Ebola
Archive
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
Categories
Monthly Archives: July 2013
It’s official – the animal study literature is biased… but whose fault is it?
Category: Biology, Blog, Data, Funding, Neuroscience, PLOS Biology, Publishing, Research, Review
4 Comments
